Mar 2008
iWeb 08 tested only for Safari
31/03/08 07:55 Filed in: Apple
Assuming that iWeb 08 templates for MacOSX have not
been pre-tested with major browsers will save you a
lot of headaches. If your only visitors will be
MacOSX Safari users than you are going to be okay. If
you wish other browsers to view and print your
website than be ready to do some grueling tests and
dig into the source code. For example, using the
Comic template and visiting the site with Internet
Explorer 7 gives you graphics that are not correctly
aligned, printing that does not work and in some
cases jammed or inaccessible web pages.
After may hours swimming through the source code and trying different things (not helped by my MacOSX Leopard upgrade making websharing disfunctional) I finally discovered that it was the shadows in this template that were causing all of the problems in their DIV containers. After deactivating shadows in the inspector for every object and text box for every page the site could suddenly print in Internet Explorer. There were a couple of objects (some arrows) that I could not disable the shadows for so I simply took screenshots and saved those objects as jpgs to replace the objects with shadows.
So it is possible to have a compatible website with at least the Comic template but be prepared to test and test and test since it appears that Apple did not.
Note, since I am not a Apple employee I cannot guarantee that tests were not made on other browsers but if they were they must have been subcontracted to Microsoft.
After may hours swimming through the source code and trying different things (not helped by my MacOSX Leopard upgrade making websharing disfunctional) I finally discovered that it was the shadows in this template that were causing all of the problems in their DIV containers. After deactivating shadows in the inspector for every object and text box for every page the site could suddenly print in Internet Explorer. There were a couple of objects (some arrows) that I could not disable the shadows for so I simply took screenshots and saved those objects as jpgs to replace the objects with shadows.
So it is possible to have a compatible website with at least the Comic template but be prepared to test and test and test since it appears that Apple did not.
Note, since I am not a Apple employee I cannot guarantee that tests were not made on other browsers but if they were they must have been subcontracted to Microsoft.
Nikon Coolpix p50 does not impress
20/03/08 08:31 Filed in: Consumer
This camera has definitely been a disappointment.
Below are a few of the problems that we have
experienced.
There were 2 pluses for us however.
So, in general, if you can avoid this camera, do so. If you receive it as a gift, just smile and thank the giver.
We picked it up at our local Manor store where they refuse to let you try anything in advance, it is all by recommendation only. That was obviously a mistake.
- Pictures are often out of focus
- Indoor lightning is not detected causing poorly colored photos
- the USB connection is USB 1 so it is horribly slow transferring images or video
- instructions for "High ISO" setting say the pictures may come out grainy... yes they do, unusable
- battery indicator only appears when the battery is about to fail... very useful. Otherwise it is hidden
- you cannot use date stamping and the anti-shake feature at the same time
- the anti-shake feature does not work on most of the photos
- low quality view finder (the image are very grainy)
There were 2 pluses for us however.
- it does accept AA batteries
- the video that it does is okay (well okay if you are used to 8mm film quality but that is fine for our home movies)
So, in general, if you can avoid this camera, do so. If you receive it as a gift, just smile and thank the giver.
We picked it up at our local Manor store where they refuse to let you try anything in advance, it is all by recommendation only. That was obviously a mistake.